Tim, I suppose you’ve been begging Igor to enter this forum and the only thing you could reply on your very first message is a little turd about English language, not even typed correctly. Very disappointing, but not surprising actually.
I’m not sure I should reply to it, but in the context of the conversation, your ‘if’ could have well been replaced by ‘because’ : « So because they’re making a blockchain now, it means they didn’t have a blockchain before, so I was right.
Moreover, if you really used the operative word ‘if’ as a condition, as you say, it means you condition the fact to be right to the fact they’re making a blockchain now : « I was right only and only if they’re making a blockchain now
». Which means that if this condition is not respected, you were not right : « I was wrong if they’re not making a blockchain now
». Is that really what you wanted to say ? You, idiot. You didn’t even reach 5th level of English yet.
Anyway, this is a very minor point and it’s not interesting. I’m just going to your level of conversation. The important point is that a dozen of investigation has been led all around the world and, while authorities all had free access to your ‘amazing investigation’ for which you ostentatiously claim having demonstrated OneCoin is a scam, none of them concluded that OneCoin is a scam. Don’t you think there must be something wrong with your demonstration ? Coz it seems that your work doesn’t convince anyone.
You even contacted some of the authorities directly to introduce your scintillating work. For example, on the 26th of August 2016, you published on Facebook the letter you sent to Singapore Police Force.
https://www.facebook.com/singaporepolic ... 5672332787
In this letter, you mention that you join a pre-version of your article.
Then, what happened in Singapore ? Nothing happened.
Isn’t that a big slap to your wonderful investigation ?
Similarly, on the 22nd of March 2017 (9:41pm), you wrote on BehindMLM : « I’ve also messaged our contact at polizi.se with these and more.
» I don’t know what you meant by ‘polizi’ because this word doesn’t exist in any language (your fucking typing skills again, I suppose). But the context of the conversation was the Swedish investigation, so I suppose you sent your investigation to Swedish authorities. Then, what happened in Sweden ? Nothing happened.
Your ‘work’ doesn’t demonstrate anything, not even the beginning of an evidence. Anyone sensible would acknowledge it. But not you. Well, I think it’s time to catch up your retardation.
You can send your so-called investigation to all the authorities you want, it’s not going to change anything. Your investigation is a useless empty shell. You can send it to the Italian Antitrust Authority if you want. The persons responsible for the OneCoin affair are Iacopo Berti and Fabio Massimo Esposito and the reference code for the OneCoin affair is PS 10550. Go ahead ! You’re just going to make the fool of yourself once more.
The funny thing is that when you have to face the fact that your investigation doesn’t demonstrate anything, your answer is : « But there is no fallacy ! ».
But, Tim, your investigation as a whole is a fallacy
. It is even written on page 1 : « He (Tim Curry) believes he has provided enough information here (which is extensive) to prove that OneCoin is indeed a scam…
» Huh ! No you didn’t ! That’s a fallacy. It’s a fallacious attempt to make people to believe you have demonstrated something. You owe me 0.25 BTC. But I prefer you pay me in OC.
Now let me return the favor. Can you point out here one single evidence proving that OneCoin is a scam ?
If you can, I’ll give you all my love. If not, GTFO.